BLUF: Drone Dilemma
Unless you follow the commercial drone market closely, you probably missed one of the biggest shifts in the sector over the past couple weeks. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), building on its December decision to add foreign-made drones and their critical components to its “Covered List,” is now proposing to retroactively strip sales clearance from drones it had already approved.
The trigger is LiDAR obstacle avoidance, which the agency has folded into a broad new definition of "military grade" alongside thermal imaging, spray systems, docking stations and swarming. In layman's terms, several of the most popular consumer drones in America, DJI’s Air 3S and Mini 5 Pro among them, would come off the shelves, effectively cratering any ability for American consumers to purchase drones on the open market.
This action though, doesn't come without cause. As we have seen in Ukraine, we’re beginning to see in Europe and south of the border, and have even had some scares here at home, these drone systems can be turned from consumer gadgets into extremely capable weapons with very little effort. Not to mention the possibilities for China to exploit these systems for its own military and intelligence purposes.
Ironically, Beijing shares these concerns and has moved to tighten who can buy and fly these systems in China, citing much of the same logic. But that hasn’t stopped the CCP from pressuring Washington to reverse course. China’s Ministry of Commerce recently announced countermeasures including case-by-case review of drone and component exports bound for the United States and a ban on dealings with six American entities, a fairly clear signal of how much leverage Beijing thinks it holds over our consumer drone market.
The FCC's policy push, alongside government and military initiatives like the Drone Dominance Program, is clearly aimed at building American drone manufacturing capacity. The catch is that most of the capital and nearly all of the demand signals are flowing toward military and dual-use systems and the supply chains that feed them. The question therefore becomes not only who steps in to provide an American commercial alternative free of Chinese parts, but whether, as the drone nerds on Reddit have started to ask, you and I will be able to buy and fly one of these systems at all.
If you are interesting in receiving our full newsletter every Thursday, subscribe here.
